A project of Freedom in Education (opens in a new tab)
A site that grades other people's evidence has to say who is doing the grading. This page says who.
Who writes it
[Name, role, and one line of background for each editor. Example: "Jane Doe, editor. Former principal and high school science teacher."]
Who reviews the grades
Before launch, two researchers whose work appears in the evidence files review the evidence bar and every grade. Their names appear here with their permission:
- [Reviewer 1, affiliation, date reviewed]
- [Reviewer 2, affiliation, date reviewed]
A reviewer's name means they checked the grades against the studies. It does not mean they endorse everything on the site, and no researcher listed on the experts page has been asked to endorse it.
Who pays for it
[Funder and relationship in one sentence. Example: "The site is funded by [organization], a nonprofit. No curriculum publisher, assessment company or tutoring provider pays for anything on it."]
We list this because the field is full of materials paid for by the people who sell the programs being reviewed.
What we don't do
- We don't sell or recommend specific commercial programs. The curriculum review rubric is a method, not a shopping list.
- We don't accept sponsored content.
- We don't collect personal data. There are no logins and no tracking beyond basic page counts.
How to reach us
[Email address for corrections and grade challenges. Keep one address, checked weekly.]
If you think a grade is wrong, use the process on How to challenge a grade. Corrections to a fact or a link are made within a week and logged on the page's change log.