Science of Learning Institute

Sources

Reviewed · 1 min read

Every study and source cited on the site, in one list. Each entry shows the pages that cite it.

  1. AERO explicit instruction(opens in a new tab)

    edresearch.edu.au

  2. Agarwal, Nunes & Blunt 2021(opens in a new tab)

    osf.io

  3. Agodini et al. 2010–2013(opens in a new tab)

    mathematica.org

  4. Alfieri et al. 2011, discovery-based instruction(opens in a new tab)

    texasldcenter.org

  5. Barbieri, Clerjuste & Chawla 2023, meta-analysis of worked examples in math(opens in a new tab)

    doi.org

  6. Baseball study explainer(opens in a new tab)

    nataliewexler.substack.com

  7. Bennett 2017(opens in a new tab)

    gov.uk

  8. Blazar et al. 2020(opens in a new tab)

    cepr.harvard.edu

  9. Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development: Fraction Face-Off! rating(opens in a new tab)

    blueprintsprograms.org

  10. Blueprints summary(opens in a new tab)

    blueprintsprograms.org

  11. Bowers 2021, reply to Fletcher, Savage & Vaughn(opens in a new tab)

    link.springer.com

  12. Bowers debate summary(opens in a new tab)

    texasldcenter.org

  13. Buckingham 2020(opens in a new tab)

    cambridge.org

  14. Camilli et al. reanalyses(opens in a new tab)

    pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  15. Cepeda et al. 2006, spacing(opens in a new tab)

    pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  16. CEPR, Learning by the Book(opens in a new tab)

    cepr.harvard.edu

  17. Chalk & Talk ep. 1(opens in a new tab)

    annastokke.com

  18. Chalk & Talk ep. 10: Maximizing learning through explicit instruction (Zach Groshell)(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  19. Chalk & Talk ep. 16(opens in a new tab)

    annastokke.com

  20. Chalk & Talk ep. 18(opens in a new tab)

    annastokke.com

  21. Chalk & Talk ep. 2(opens in a new tab)

    annastokke.com

  22. Chalk & Talk ep. 22(opens in a new tab)

    annastokke.com

  23. Chalk & Talk ep. 4(opens in a new tab)

    annastokke.com

  24. Chalk & Talk ep. 49(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  25. Chalk & Talk ep. 50(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  26. Chalk & Talk ep. 57(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  27. Chalk & Talk ep. 58(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  28. Chalk & Talk ep. 66(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  29. Chalk & Talk ep. 67(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  30. Chalk & Talk ep. 7(opens in a new tab)

    annastokke.com

  31. Chalk & Talk ep. 75(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  32. Chalk & Talk ep. 76(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  33. Chalk & Talk ep. 79(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  34. Chalk & Talk ep. 82(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  35. Chalk & Talk ep. 9(opens in a new tab)

    annastokke.com

  36. Chalk & Talk episodes(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  37. Chalk & Talk eps. 73–74(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  38. Chalk & Talk home(opens in a new tab)

    chalkandtalkpodcast.com

  39. Chalkbeat on grade retention research and Mississippi (2023)(opens in a new tab)

    chalkbeat.org

  40. Classroom review of 50 experiments(opens in a new tab)

    retrievalpractice.org

  41. Cowan 2001, working memory(opens in a new tab)

    pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  42. Deans for Impact second edition(opens in a new tab)

    deansforimpact.org

  43. Defending the science of learning(opens in a new tab)

    thenext30years.substack.com

  44. Dunlosky et al. 2013, study techniques(opens in a new tab)

    psychologicalscience.org

  45. EdWeek on Tyner & Kabourek(opens in a new tab)

    edweek.org

  46. EdWorkingPapers(opens in a new tab)

    edworkingpapers.com

  47. EEF 2018(opens in a new tab)

    educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk

  48. EEF 2019(opens in a new tab)

    educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk

  49. EEF review release(opens in a new tab)

    educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk

  50. EEF, Embedding Formative Assessment trial(opens in a new tab)

    educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk

  51. Ehri et al. 2001 (National Reading Panel)(opens in a new tab)

    journals.sagepub.com

  52. England phonics data 2018(opens in a new tab)

    gov.uk

  53. Facts on Fire: math fact practice(opens in a new tab)

    factsonfire.com

  54. Fletcher, Savage & Vaughn 2021(opens in a new tab)

    discovery-pp.ucl.ac.uk

  55. Fraction Face-Off! program profile (Stanford NSSA)(opens in a new tab)

    nssa.stanford.edu

  56. Fuchs et al. 2013(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  57. Fuchs et al. 2014(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  58. Fuchs et al. 2016(opens in a new tab)

    nssa.stanford.edu

  59. Fuchs et al. 2017, five fraction trials(opens in a new tab)

    files.eric.ed.gov

  60. Greg Ashman: Is structured or enhanced discovery better?(opens in a new tab)

    fillingthepail.substack.com

  61. Grissmer et al. 2023(opens in a new tab)

    educationnext.org

  62. Groshell interview, big DI and little di(opens in a new tab)

    reachallreaders.com

  63. Guryan et al. 2023(opens in a new tab)

    voices.uchicago.edu

  64. Harvard Usable Knowledge(opens in a new tab)

    gse.harvard.edu

  65. IES 2007, Organizing Instruction and Study(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  66. IES 2008(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  67. IES blog, December 2019 (Patrice Bain on retrieval practice)(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  68. IES evaluation summary(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  69. IES Foundational Skills guide, 2016(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  70. IES fractions guide, Rec. 1(opens in a new tab)

    marzanoresearch.com

  71. IES grant: replication of interleaved math practice with ASSISTments(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  72. IES practice guide: Assisting students struggling with mathematics (2021)(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  73. IES report: Achievement effects of four early elementary math curricula(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  74. IES via Nebraska DOE summary(opens in a new tab)

    education.ne.gov

  75. J-PAL evidence review: The transformative potential of tutoring(opens in a new tab)

    povertyactionlab.org

  76. Jackson & Makarin 2018 (J-PAL)(opens in a new tab)

    povertyactionlab.org

  77. Kalyuga, expertise reversal effect(opens in a new tab)

    my.chartered.college

  78. Kim et al. 2023 (MORE)(opens in a new tab)

    cepr.harvard.edu

  79. Klahr & Nigam 2004(opens in a new tab)

    apa.org

  80. Kluger & DeNisi 1996, feedback(opens in a new tab)

    scholars.huji.ac.il

  81. Korpershoek et al. 2026(opens in a new tab)

    research.rug.nl

  82. Kraft et al. 2024 (Nashville)(opens in a new tab)

    edworkingpapers.com

  83. Lacoe & Steinberg 2018(opens in a new tab)

    mathematica.org

  84. Lalley & Miller 2007, learning pyramid briefing(opens in a new tab)

    cusd80.com

  85. Learning Scientists summary of Rohrer, Dedrick & Burgess 2014(opens in a new tab)

    learningscientists.org

  86. Malone et al. 2019(opens in a new tab)

    edknowledge.stanford.edu

  87. Marzano summary of IES Rec. 2(opens in a new tab)

    marzanoresearch.com

  88. Math-Drills: printable multiplication sheets(opens in a new tab)

    math-drills.com

  89. McDaniel et al. 2011(opens in a new tab)

    ovid.com

  90. Mississippi First(opens in a new tab)

    mississippifirst.org

  91. Mississippi First: Contextualizing Mississippi's 2024 NAEP scores(opens in a new tab)

    mississippifirst.org

  92. Mississippi Today(opens in a new tab)

    mississippitoday.org

  93. NBER 2020 version(opens in a new tab)

    nber.org

  94. NCES Digest table 221.50: 2013 NAEP reading results by state(opens in a new tab)

    nces.ed.gov

  95. NCTQ on Mississippi teacher training in reading(opens in a new tab)

    nctq.org

  96. Nickow, Oreopoulos & Quan 2024(opens in a new tab)

    nssa.stanford.edu

  97. Oliver, Wehby & Reschly 2011(opens in a new tab)

    mona.uwi.edu

  98. Parents' Campaign(opens in a new tab)

    tpcref.org

  99. Pashler et al. 2008, learning styles(opens in a new tab)

    digitalcommons.usf.edu

  100. Perry, what we don't know(opens in a new tab)

    my.chartered.college

  101. Recht & Leslie 1988(opens in a new tab)

    coreknowledge.org

  102. Roediger & Karpicke 2006(opens in a new tab)

    psychology.ecu.edu

  103. Roediger et al. 2011(opens in a new tab)

    profiles.wustl.edu

  104. Rohrer et al. 2020 (IES)(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  105. Rohrer et al. 2020, textbooks(opens in a new tab)

    link.springer.com

  106. Rohrer, Dedrick & Stershic 2015(opens in a new tab)

    Gwern.net

  107. Rohrer, Dedrick, Hartwig & Cheung 2020, randomized trial of interleaved math practice(opens in a new tab)

    doi.org

  108. Rosenshine 2012, Principles of Instruction(opens in a new tab)

    aft.org

  109. Seidenberg critique(opens in a new tab)

    seidenbergreading.net

  110. Siegler et al. 2012, early predictors of high school math(opens in a new tab)

    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  111. Simonsen et al. 2008(opens in a new tab)

    muse.jhu.edu

  112. Sinha & Kapur 2021, productive failure (summary)(opens in a new tab)

    futurity.org

  113. SREB: Early literacy policies work when statewide efforts support them(opens in a new tab)

    sreb.org

  114. Stecker, Fuchs & Fuchs 2005, via Leiden(opens in a new tab)

    scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl

  115. Stockard et al. 2018, Direct Instruction(opens in a new tab)

    scholarsbank.uoregon.edu

  116. Stuebing et al. 2008(opens in a new tab)

    texasldcenter.org

  117. Taylor & Rohrer 2010(opens in a new tab)

    retrievalpractice.org

  118. Taylor & Rohrer 2010, via AFT(opens in a new tab)

    aft.org

  119. Tes on the EEF review: what next for cognitive science in the classroom(opens in a new tab)

    tes.com

  120. Tyner & Kabourek 2020(opens in a new tab)

    fordhaminstitute.org

  121. University of Virginia Q&A on the Core Knowledge lottery study(opens in a new tab)

    news.virginia.edu

  122. WestEd replication of interleaved math practice(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  123. What Works Clearinghouse review of the interleaved math practice trial(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  124. Wheelock / ExcelinEd brief(opens in a new tab)

    excelined.org

  125. WWC review of MORE(opens in a new tab)

    ies.ed.gov

  126. Yang et al. 2021, classroom quizzing(opens in a new tab)

    scholars.hkbu.edu.hk