Evidence here: Some · Klahr studies

Teach scientific methods directly, like how to design a fair test, and build connected science knowledge that reading lessons can draw on.

What matters most here

RankPracticeGrade
1Teach experiment design directly before open investigations (principle 2)Evidence grade: Strong Strong; in a classic study of 3rd and 4th graders, 77% mastered it after direct teaching (Klahr & Nigam(opens in a new tab))
2Science units linked to reading time (principle 10)Evidence grade: Strong Strong in principle; the Core Knowledge sequence includes science
3Quizzing and spaced review of science content (principles 6, 7)Evidence grade: Proven in classrooms Proven across school levels
4Labeled diagrams explained part by part (principle 1)Evidence grade: Strong Strong (lab)

A lesson in this room

Quiz on last week's states of matter. Teacher explains and shows a fair test with ramps: change one thing, keep the rest the same. Students design one together, then one in pairs. Exit: "Which of these two tests is fair, and why?"

Leader look-fors

  • Was the method taught before students used it?
  • Can students say what idea the activity is about?

Stop doing

Open-ended "discover it yourself" labs as the first exposure to an idea students haven't been taught.

Where the evidence runs out

The Klahr studies were short and specific to experiment design. Larger trials of full elementary science programs are scarce.

Principles

1 studies behind this page

Sources

  1. Klahr & Nigam 2004 (opens in a new tab)

    apa.org