Evidence here: Thin · none specific

Worked examples and frequent retrieval are the core. For advanced students who already have the basics, a short problem before instruction is a reasonable option to test.

What matters most here

RankPracticeGrade
1Worked examples for chemistry and physics problems, faded over time (principle 3)Evidence grade: Strong Strong (Barbieri et al.(opens in a new tab))
2Cumulative quizzing with feedback (principles 6, 7)Evidence grade: Proven in classrooms Proven across school levels
3Reading in science: background taught first, then text (principle 10)Evidence grade: Strong Strong in principle
4Problem-solving before instruction for students with the basicsEvidence grade: Promising Promising and contested; strongest evidence in secondary and university STEM (summary(opens in a new tab))

A lesson in this room

Quiz on last unit's mole concept. Teacher works a stoichiometry example with each step labeled. Students complete a matched problem with the last step blank, then a full one, checked on boards. Mixed review set for homework.

Leader look-fors

  • Solved examples before practice
  • Questions from earlier units in quizzes

Stop doing

Reading a slide of text aloud while students copy it. Assigning complex problems before students have seen a single worked example.

Where the evidence runs out

Most worked-example research is in math. Productive failure studies vary in what they compare against, so test it with a class rather than adopting it wholesale.

Principles

2 studies behind this page

Sources

  1. Barbieri, Clerjuste & Chawla 2023, meta-analysis of worked examples in math (opens in a new tab)

    doi.org

  2. Sinha & Kapur 2021, productive failure (summary) (opens in a new tab)

    futurity.org