Evidence here: Some · MORE trial

Young children learn science best as knowledge: taught directly, read aloud in connected units, and revisited, with hands-on activities after the ideas are taught.

What matters most here

RankPracticeGrade
1Connected science units with read-alouds and directly taught vocabulary (principle 10)Evidence grade: Proven in classrooms Proven for science reading comprehension in grades 1–2 (Kim et al.(opens in a new tab))
2Explain and show first, then hands-on (principle 2)Evidence grade: Strong Strong in general; few trials at this age
3Revisit earlier units in oral warm-ups (principles 6, 7)Evidence grade: Promising Promising at this age

A lesson in this room

Oral warm-up: "What do plants need? What does a root do?" Teacher reads and explains a short text on seeds with a labeled picture. Students plant seeds and draw and label what they did, using the three unit words.

Leader look-fors

  • Is science taught at its scheduled time?
  • Are the activities tied to ideas the teacher has explained?

Stop doing

Science as a stand-alone activity day with no connected knowledge before or after. Cutting science time for more reading-skills practice.

Where the evidence runs out

The EEF review found very little evidence testing cognitive science strategies with the youngest children (Tes(opens in a new tab)). Recommendations here lean on the knowledge-building trials and general principles.

Principles

1 studies behind this page

Sources

  1. Kim et al. 2023 (MORE) (opens in a new tab)

    cepr.harvard.edu

  2. Tes on the EEF review: what next for cognitive science in the classroom (opens in a new tab)

    tes.com